All three proposals have great points. I believe as a community we can choose one proposal, while also considering the highlights of the other 2. It would be unfair to say that T2 and T3 are “better” than T1, given that discourse has been building over time and most likely the latter ones built on top of T1’s feedback.
From T1 something I would highlight is the DAO controlled treasury and making sure token is distributed before launch to be usable as work token, and transferable slightly before launch.
From T3, the Stakedrop detail, specially minting subsidy. Furthermore the discussion on T3’s page leads to think that T3 and T2 are quite similar anyway, where main differences would be in stakedrop percentages (which I’m comfortable with both) and inflation vs multiple sale raises (where I’d rather have DAO controlled inflation).
If I had to go for one proposal as a base, I would chose the great work of @benlongstaff. Your proposal captures previous success factors for KEEP + tBTCv1, as well as pain points. In my opinion, it paves the way for wider community engagement and future proofing KEaNU endeavors such as tBTCv2.
Keen to hear from the rest of the KEaNU community.